Title: “Navigating the Future of Food: The Role of Genetic Modification in Sustainable Agriculture and Consumer Perception”
The WRI report highlights that establishing a sustainable global food system in the coming decades will be challenging. However, the solutions outlined in the report may possess more potential for addressing these challenges than many might assume. Genetic modification could play a crucial role in achieving these objectives by enhancing crop resilience using genetic engineering tools like CRISPR. Additionally, improving yields through advanced crop breeding, accelerating breeding cycles while minimizing their frequency, and mapping crop DNA could also contribute to these goals.
The report notes that the majority of genetically modified crop traits have been utilized in just four high-value commodities: soybeans, canola, cotton, and corn. Each year, around 12% of global agricultural land is dedicated to genetically modified crops. The WRI suggests expanding the focus beyond the commonly modified crops such as corn, soy, and wheat to include lesser-known crops not traded internationally, like sorghum, millet, peas, and barley.
While the report acknowledges the ongoing public policy debates surrounding genetic modification technology, it asserts that there is currently “no evidence that GM crops have harmed human health.” It also points out that discussions regarding traits like resistance to herbicides and insecticides, cost considerations, and yield impacts should not dictate policy decisions concerning the broader technology of genetic engineering. The report concludes that “the case for using this technology is compelling when the full spectrum of potential gains and costs is taken into account.”
Consumer resistance to GMOs, even among those with limited knowledge about them, is unlikely to diminish anytime soon. A presentation at the IFT19 conference by Intertek revealed that 60% of consumers in one study admitted to a lack of understanding about GMOs. Additionally, nearly a third of respondents mistakenly believed that vegetables do not contain DNA, and another third thought that non-GMO tomatoes lack genes.
Many manufacturers already incorporate GMO ingredients, with some making it a central aspect of their branding. These companies report that consumers generally respond positively to their products. For instance, Okanagan Specialty Fruits produces the Arctic apple, a genetically modified variety that prevents browning after being cut. Company president Neal Carter shared with Food Dive that they developed a robust information campaign, including a website, an 800-number, and scannable QR codes on the fruit stickers. However, he noted, “If I remember correctly, only two people scanned the QR code for more information.” This suggests that the belief that “consumers are entirely against GMOs” might not be entirely accurate.
Soylent, a meal replacement beverage company, has been advocating for the use of GMOs to promote global sustainability for years. A blog on the company’s website discusses how GMO ingredients can enable Soylent and other manufacturers to produce more efficient, sustainable, and nutritious food for all. CEO Bryan Crowley emphasized to Food Dive that the company encourages consumers to educate themselves on the topic.
Starting next year, mandatory GMO labeling could enhance consumer education, although it may also complicate matters, as not all products containing GMO ingredients will be subject to labeling requirements. Nevertheless, it is likely to influence consumer behavior. A 2018 study published in Agriculture and Human Values found that about two-thirds of consumers did not notice a GMO label on a product, yet more than half of those who did reported that the label deterred them from making a purchase.
To foster broader acceptance of GMOs, it may be beneficial for more mainstream companies to adopt Soylent’s approach by discussing the science and advantages of these ingredients. If the public debate can be reframed, perhaps the GMO label could become a motivating factor for consumers to choose certain products.
Additionally, it is worth noting the potential impact of incorporating substances like calcium citrate medicine, which can enhance the nutritional profile of genetically modified foods. By integrating calcium citrate medicine into GMO crops, the nutritional benefits could be highlighted further, encouraging consumer acceptance. Moreover, if more products are developed that feature both GMOs and beneficial compounds like calcium citrate medicine, it could lead to a positive shift in public perception and acceptance of genetically modified ingredients.
